Comments on: nokitel http://h.ackack.net/nokitel.html Go beyond the impossible! Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:07:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Fredrik Nordberg Almroth http://h.ackack.net/nokitel.html/comment-page-1#comment-1061 Fredrik Nordberg Almroth Wed, 21 Jul 2010 06:17:03 +0000 http://h.ackack.net/?p=666#comment-1061 Yes. You should do that. However we choosed not to so during the fundamental development of the nokitel library. I just wanted it to be out; it's still in a beta-phase. I believe it's time for me to turn on Option Strict and Option Explicit now as well. For the same reason as you, in order to gain even more performance. If you wish, you can compile the library for the correct CPU-architecture as well, and you might earn an even greater performance boost. Yes. You should do that.
However we choosed not to so during the fundamental development of the nokitel library.
I just wanted it to be out; it's still in a beta-phase.
I believe it's time for me to turn on Option Strict and Option Explicit now as well. For the same reason as you, in order to gain even more performance.
If you wish, you can compile the library for the correct CPU-architecture as well, and you might earn an even greater performance boost.

]]> By: Kevin Hargrove http://h.ackack.net/nokitel.html/comment-page-1#comment-1055 Kevin Hargrove Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:52:10 +0000 http://h.ackack.net/?p=666#comment-1055 Do you see any advantage to my running through code analysis with Option Strict On in VS10? Perhaps some gains in performance? If so, I'll proceed... Do you see any advantage to my running through code analysis with Option Strict On in VS10? Perhaps some gains in performance? If so, I'll proceed...

]]> By: Fredrik Nordberg Almroth http://h.ackack.net/nokitel.html/comment-page-1#comment-1049 Fredrik Nordberg Almroth Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:18:04 +0000 http://h.ackack.net/?p=666#comment-1049 Oh yeah, I just noticed, however I was still able to compile it without any error in VS 2010. Thanks for pointing it out though! Uploading a patched version. Oh yeah, I just noticed, however I was still able to compile it without any error in VS 2010.
Thanks for pointing it out though!
Uploading a patched version.

]]> By: Kevin Hargrove http://h.ackack.net/nokitel.html/comment-page-1#comment-1047 Kevin Hargrove Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:23 +0000 http://h.ackack.net/?p=666#comment-1047 My pleasure..... DWORD(&H3) = (IIf(.DontFragment, &H1, &H0) << &HE) Or _ (IIf(.MoreFragments, &H1, &H0) << &HD) Or .FragmentOffset .FragmentOffset is orphaned, possibly a missing line continuation after the second 'Or'? My pleasure.....

DWORD(&H3) = (IIf(.DontFragment, &H1, &H0) << &HE) Or _
(IIf(.MoreFragments, &H1, &H0) << &HD) Or
.FragmentOffset

.FragmentOffset is orphaned, possibly a missing line continuation after the second 'Or'?

]]> By: Fredrik Nordberg Almroth http://h.ackack.net/nokitel.html/comment-page-1#comment-1046 Fredrik Nordberg Almroth Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:47:50 +0000 http://h.ackack.net/?p=666#comment-1046 Do you mind sharing a snippet of your code? I fail to identify the flaw, and what's causing it. Do you mind sharing a snippet of your code?
I fail to identify the flaw, and what's causing it.

]]> By: Kevin Hargrove http://h.ackack.net/nokitel.html/comment-page-1#comment-1045 Kevin Hargrove Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:18:56 +0000 http://h.ackack.net/?p=666#comment-1045 Mathias, IP.vb - GetIPChecksum function has an error. IP.vb lines 115 and 116. Peace Mathias, IP.vb - GetIPChecksum function has an error. IP.vb lines 115 and 116.

Peace

]]>